The Supermyth concept is explained in-depth in my article "On Supermyths" {Click here}.

What are supermyths and braced myths?

Supermyths, of which braced myths are a sub-type - are ironic unintended, or else a deliberate and disingenuous, consequences of fallacy dissemination. Supermyths have three very specific components:

1. The creation of a fallacy, myth or error by an orthodox expert

2. it being used by another expert who in turn promotes it as being ‘true’ and

3. whilst still thinking that it is true, promotes it as a good example of the need to be healthily sceptical of bad scholarship.

Moreover, fourthly:

Braced myths are supermyths that have been pointedly deployed by orthodox scholars in order to bust another specific myth or fallacy. The braced myth hypothesis is that using one myth as a specific mythbusting device in this way braces the supermyth to make it further entrenched and therefore more difficult to prevent it being credulously disseminated as veracious knowledge.

Read two HealthWatch articles by Mike Sutton. The first on the Spinach Supermyth and the second on the Vam Meme (with Matt Henn and Linda Gibson). The reading pane in each box below can be expanded by clicking the page expansion button.

The peer reviewed scholarly article below explains how the IDD research method bust some of the most entrenched modern myths in science. Open access