Readers of this website can buy a copy of Science Fraud at a 40% discount off the current retail price. The book provides all the independently verifiable data, supported by academic references to sources, that proves both Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace plagiarised the theory of evolution by natural selection.
Visit the publisher's website Curtis Press and use the code suttonsites24 to get this deal at checkout before paying.
Mike Sutton's discovery of the Darwin Supermyth. Watch the video on Amazon HERE
DYSOLOGY
On Darwin Day 2022 Curtis Press published "Science Fraud: Darwin's plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's theory".
How do we solve the science problem of the supposed later dual independent conceptions of a prior published theory?
How did Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace in 1858/59 supposedly independently and miraculously replicate what Darwin, Wallace, de Beer, Mayer, Dawkins and many other top biologists said was essentially the exact same full theory of evolution by natural selection and the very same four essential words to name it (natural process of selection that BigData analysis shows Patrick Matthew originated and had published in 1831? And why, in light of the new data that busts Darwin and Wallace's excuse that Matthew's theory was unread before 1860, are the Darwin dependent Linnean Society and the Royal Society now shamefully publishing desperately silly papers by cyberstalking obscene criminals, workplace harassment criminals and repeat research plagiarists that claim Matthew's theory is now suddenly and yet ever so conveniently to be argued to be significantly different to that published by Darwin and Wallace?
The Patrick Mattew Violin was made to teach science and history to be more scientific and to accept the validity of verifiable empirical data over made up stories that such new found data debunks as untrue lies and other misinformation
THE PATRICK MATTHEW VIOLIN
More information about the Patrick Matthew Violin, including more pictures and videos, can be found in the dedicated page of PatrickMatthew.com HERE
AI V Darwin
Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) finds Charles Darwin guilty of lying about who read the prior published theory of the natural process of selection (Here)
ChatGPT also concludes that on a balance of reasonable probabilites, which is the test for a guilty verict in a civil law suit, that Patrick Matthew's prior published theory did influence Darwin's later replication of it even though Darwin claimed it was his own independent later conception of the very same theory. [Here)
A.I. CHATGPT also concludes that Charles Darwin's 1859 book The Orign of Species was influenced by Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior publication of the entire theory of evolution by natural slection, and it predicts this will come to be recognised by the scientific community as an important fact. Here.
Visit my website PatrickMatthew.com for all the verifiable and fully referenced empirical data facts on the greatest science fraud by plagiary and proven supporting lies
Get the facts on Dr Mike Sutton's original Big Data hi-tech discovery of the ‘New Data’ that bust the 155-year-old Darwinist myth that no naturalist known to Darwin or Wallace read Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior published discovery of macroevolution by natural selection. In fact, the New Data reveals that seven naturalists read and cited it before Darwin's and Wallace's supposed independent replications. Four were known to Darwin / Wallace and three played major roles at the epicentre of influence on their replicating work.
Nullius is Available at all Amazon stores and good bricks and mortar bookshops. Beware of bogus fake and counterfeit examples being disseminated by criminal ID fraudsters, hackers, book pirates, cyber stalkers and malicious Darwin cult worshippers on the Internet. Pirated downloadable PDF versions are likely to contain phishing malware and computer viruses.
For future generations, it is important that we archive important Tweets and other social media. This is because tweets can be deleted and web companies come and go. By way of example, I and two collegues published an important article on President Donald Trump's lethal antivaxxing tweets. In 2022 Trump's Twitter account was closed by Twitter because he used it to incite vilence and spread anti-democracy lies. Consequently, his tweets - cited in our article were all deleted and thus rendered invisible. With forsight I had earlier archived them and published those archived links on my blogsite. You can see them all there and read what Trump wrote Click to see. Image archived here. Pdf HERE
The peer reviewed scholarly article below explains how the IDD research method bust some of the most entrenched modern myths in science. Open access
Impress your friends and confuse your enemies with empirical facts